0%
Ever wonder why B2B buyers eye your security credentials before sealing the deal? Here's the naked truth: data protection isn’t optional anymore. A staggering 87% of consumers see data privacy as a human right, and 97% of U.S. consumers are worried about it. Scary, right?
Without SOC 2 or ISO 27001, you're showing up to a trust party empty-handed. You could have the best product in the world, but without security credentials? Good luck.
Both frameworks help you:
ISO 27001 is the global favorite, while SOC 2 is the go-to for U.S.-centric companies. As one expert puts it: “SOC for U.S., ISO for everywhere else.”
Here’s the kicker: they share about 96% of the same controls. So why not go for both and cut down compliance costs using the same team and tools? In today’s paranoid, data-driven world, these certifications are your golden ticket to the trust club.
"SOC 2 is favored by North American companies, especially in sectors like cloud services, SaaS, and IT services, where detailed reports on internal controls are crucial." — Conformance1 Team, Cybersecurity compliance experts
SOC 2 is a security and compliance framework developed by the AICPA to evaluate how well a company protects customer data across its systems and cloud environments. These criteria are defined under the official SOC 2 standards, which outline how organizations should design and operate controls to protect customer data. Instead of telling you which controls to implement, SOC 2 checks whether your existing security practices are properly designed and consistently followed. It’s not a legal requirement, but in the North American SaaS and tech market, it’s become a near-mandatory trust badge—one that signals your business can be trusted with sensitive customer information.
Want the real difference between SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2? It's simple.
Type 1 reports are like that perfect Instagram photo - everything looks great in that single moment. "Are your security controls properly designed?" That's all they ask. Faster and cheaper, making it a tempting first step.
Type 2 reports, though? They're watching you for months. Not just asking if your controls look good, but if they actually work over time (typically 3-12 months). No wonder most clients now toss Type 1 reports in the trash - they want the real deal.
Choosing between them? Consider this:
American SaaS companies don't just like SOC 2 - they're obsessed with it. Here's why:
Truth is, if you're selling software in America without SOC 2, you're basically showing up to a gunfight with a spoon. For many buyers, SOC 2 isn’t just a report—it’s treated as a de facto SOC2 certification that determines whether a vendor is even considered.
SOC 2 breaks down into five Trust Services Criteria. Like at a buffet, only one is mandatory; the rest are up to you:
Security (the main dish): Protects your systems from unauthorized access. Includes the basics like monitoring, risk assessment, and access controls.
Availability (side option): Proves your systems stay up and running when promised. Cloud providers, this one's for you.
Processing Integrity (specialty item): Confirms your processes are "complete, valid, accurate, timely, and authorized." Financial services eat this up.
Confidentiality (extra protection): Guards business secrets through proper access limits and data handling.
Privacy (cherry on top): Ensures personal information follows your stated policies. Essential if you're handling people's personal details.

SOC 2 Trust Service Criteria
Here's the kicker – only Security is mandatory. The rest? Pick and choose based on what your business and customers need. It's like a security buffet, but one where you better not skip the main course.
ISO 27001 is the global heavyweight champ of security standards, with more than 33,000 organizations worldwide flaunting this certification. At its core, the ISO 27001 meaning goes beyond security controls—it represents a structured, organization-wide approach to managing information security risk. While SOC 2 stays mostly in America's backyard, ISO 27001 crosses borders like a global security passport.
Ever heard of ISMS? It's the beating heart of ISO 27001 – an Information Security Management System that doesn't just care about your fancy tech. It pulls together your people, processes, AND technology into one security powerhouse.
What does this ISMS thing actually make you do?
Organizations aiming to stay ISO 27001 compliant follow these ISMS practices continuously.
This structured approach is what organizations refer to as ISO 27001 compliance—not a one-time effort, but a continuously managed security program. Security pros call this "defense in depth" - fancy talk for "we've got layers on layers of protection." Like an onion, but for keeping your data safe instead of making you cry.
The 2022 update shook things up. They ditched the old 114 controls and now have 93 - but don't be fooled! It's not laziness. They just got smarter about grouping them.
Instead of 14 confusing categories, there are now four themes that actually make sense: Organizational, People, Physical, and Technological. About time, right?
They've finally caught up with modern problems like cloud services and threat intelligence. Because let's face it - today's hackers aren't using the same playbook from 2013.
European businesses have a serious crush on ISO 27001, and for good reason:
It's like ISO 27001 and GDPR went on a date and realized they're perfect for each other. European companies already jumping through GDPR hoops find ISO 27001 fits right into their compliance dance routine.
One security director put it perfectly: "Having ISO 27001 certification immediately puts European companies in a position to compete globally." It's their golden ticket to the international business chocolate factory.
Europeans love their systems and documentation (shocking, I know). ISO 27001's structured approach feels like home to them, while SOC 2's flexibility makes Europeans nervous - like serving pizza with pineapple.
When European companies are shopping for vendors, they ask for ISO 27001 like Americans ask for SOC 2. If you're eyeing European markets and don't have ISO 27001, you might as well show up to the party wearing last season's security practices.
ISO 27001 and SOC 2 aren’t interchangeable. They target different audiences and validate security in different ways. Despite overlapping controls, their intent, execution, and outcomes differ—and those differences matter to buyers, partners, and regulators. This ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 comparison breaks down how the two frameworks differ in scope, effort, cost, and buyer expectations.
ISO 27001 is a global security standard focused on long-term governance. It proves an organization has a formal ISMS to manage risk consistently across teams, regions, and regulatory environments.
SOC 2 is a buyer-facing trust report. It shows how a SaaS or cloud company protects data in real operations, validating whether controls actually function day to day.
ISO 27001 results in an accredited certification. Organizations either pass or fail, and once certified, they can publicly present compliance as a recognized security benchmark.
SOC 2 delivers a CPA-issued attestation report. Although technically an attestation, many buyers still refer to the outcome as SOC 2 certification when evaluating vendors during procurement and security reviews. It provides an independent opinion on whether stated controls were properly designed and operated.
ISO 27001 is a long-term effort. Most organizations take 6 to 24 months to build an ISMS, document controls, complete risk assessments, and pass certification audits.
SOC 2 is faster. A Type I report may take 45 days, while Type II requires a 3–12 month testing period, still significantly shorter than ISO 27001.
ISO 27001 is resource-intensive. Certification bodies, consultants, tooling, and internal effort typically drive total costs between $50,000 and $200,000.
SOC 2 is more affordable for growing companies. Most organizations spend $12,000 to $30,000, depending on scope, readiness, and auditor selection.
ISO 27001 is documentation-heavy. Auditors expect formal policies, structured risk assessments, a Statement of Applicability, and clearly defined governance processes.
SOC 2 is evidence-driven. Policies matter, but auditors prioritize operational proof like logs, alerts, access reviews, tickets, and system records.
ISO 27001 audit results are high-level. Buyers typically see only the certificate, not detailed findings, exceptions, or internal control weaknesses.
SOC 2 reports are detailed and transparent. Exceptions and gaps are visible, giving buyers a clearer picture of real security posture.
ISO 27001 certifications remain valid for three years, supported by mandatory annual surveillance audits to confirm ongoing compliance.
SOC 2 reports are valid for one year, requiring annual audits and continuous operation of controls.
ISO 27001 is common among global enterprises and Europe-focused organizations operating across multiple regulatory environments.
SOC 2 is the default for US-based SaaS, cloud, fintech, and technology companies selling to security-conscious buyers.
ISO 27001 audits are conducted by accredited certification bodies approved by national accreditation authorities, following formal and standardized certification procedures.
SOC 2 audits are performed by licensed CPA firms under AICPA standards, where auditor reputation and judgment play a major role in how much buyers trust the final report.
Here’s a quick snapshot to summarize these differences at a glance.
| Category | ISO 27001 | SOC 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Global, formal security standard | Mostly North America, trust report for SaaS |
| Outcome | Accredited certification | CPA-issued attestation report |
| Timeline | 6–24 months | Type I: 45 days–3 months Type II: 3–12 months |
| Cost | $50k–$200k | $12k–$30k |
| Documentation | Heavy: policies, risk assessments, SoA, evidence | Lighter: prove controls work |
Wait, what? These two security frameworks that everyone keeps pitting against each other actually have more in common than you'd think! Yup, the whole "either/or" debate hides a juicy truth that could save your company serious time and money.
Here's something the consultants charging you double don't want you to know – nearly 80% of security controls between these frameworks address the exact same security needs! They're just dressed in different outfits.
What does this hidden overlap mean for you? Pure gold:
It's like finding out your favorite expensive health food and the cheaper alternative actually contain the same ingredients. Why pay twice for essentially the same protection?
Neither framework trusts you to grade your own homework – both demand independent third-party verification. Self-certification? Not a chance.
The only real difference is who signs off:
Funny thing - technically, nobody's legally forcing you to get either certification. Yet somehow 85% of enterprise buyers now demand to see your SOC 2 or ISO 27001 paperwork before they'll even consider working with you.
Optional in theory. Mandatory in reality.
Both certificates serve as business lubricant - helping deals slide through approvals 50% faster. And a whopping 62% of businesses say the biggest win was increased customer confidence.
Think about it – implementing both standards is like showing up to a security potluck with two different dishes made from mostly the same ingredients. Everyone's impressed by your effort, but you know the secret – you cooked once, served twice.
For companies playing in both American and global markets, this two-for-one approach isn't just smart – it's practically free money.
Struggling to choose between SOC 2 and ISO 27001? You’re not the only one. The real answer isn’t about which framework is “better” — it’s about which one fits your customers, your industry, and your current level of security maturity. Let’s break it down so the decision stops feeling like a gamble.
In the end, it’s rarely SOC 2 or ISO 27001 — it’s which one you tackle first. Most companies growing across markets eventually need both to stay competitive and win bigger deals.
So, what’s the final word on SOC 2 vs ISO 27001? Simple: it’s not a fight—it’s a strategy. If you’re only operating in the U.S., SOC 2 gets the job done faster, cheaper, and checks all the boxes your clients are asking for. But if your ambitions go beyond borders—or even just flirt with Europe—you’ll need ISO 27001 in your corner. These certifications aren't competitors; they’re teammates in your trust-building playbook.
And here’s the kicker: with 80% of their controls overlapping, going after both isn’t double the work—it’s a smart, scalable move. Implementing them together can slash your compliance costs, speed up sales cycles, and make your security posture bulletproof.
In a world where 85% of enterprise buyers demand a cert before they even reply to your email, playing the “wait and see” game is just bad business. So whether you're a fast-scaling startup or a global powerhouse in the making, the real question isn't if you need SOC 2 or ISO 27001—it’s how soon can you get both.
Take control of compliance, reduce risk, and build trust with UprootSecurity — where GRC becomes the bridge between checklists and real breach prevention.
→ Book a demo today

Senior Security Consultant
| Report Style |
| High-level summary |
| Detailed, exposes gaps |
| Validity | 3 years (annual audits) | 1 year |
| Typical Users | Global enterprises, Europe-heavy | US SaaS and cloud companies |
| Auditors | Accredited cert bodies | CPA |